On Mar 10, 2015, at 8:15 PM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <[email protected]> wrote:
>> So an identifier created with UsernameCaseMapped should be fine, but an >> identifier created somewhere else in sasl might not be legal? That >> _seems_ unlikely to be a problem... > > Right. > >> It might not hurt to mention the saslprepbis appendix in the note. > > Actually, Section 6.1 of draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis is an even better > pointer because it describes the differences in more detail, with an eye > toward migration from Stringprep to PRECIS. You might want to re-read that > section to determine the level of your concern. I'm sorry, were you expecting stateful reviewers? ;-) So maybe adding something to effect of "see 6.1 of that doc for more details" would be enough. But I read the note to be about coexisting with or using of non-updated SASL mechanisms, while 6.1 seems more about migrating. _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
