On 11/4/15, 10:37 AM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <[email protected]> wrote: > >That may be. We could simply remove the offending sentence: > >OLD > > 3. Case Mapping Rule: Unicode Default Case Folding MUST be applied, > as defined in the Unicode Standard [Unicode] (at the time of this > writing, the algorithm is specified in Chapter 3 of > [Unicode7.0]). The primary result of doing so is that uppercase > characters are mapped to lowercase characters. In applications > that prohibit conflicting nicknames, this rule helps to reduce > the possibility of confusion by ensuring that nicknames differing > only by case (e.g., "stpeter" vs. "StPeter") would not be > presented to a human user at the same time. > >NEW > > > 3. Case Mapping Rule: Unicode Default Case Folding MUST be applied, > as defined in the Unicode Standard [Unicode] (at the time of this > writing, the algorithm is specified in Chapter 3 of > [Unicode7.0]). In applications that prohibit conflicting > nicknames, this rule helps to reduce the possibility of > confusion by ensuring that nicknames differing only by case > (e.g., "stpeter" vs. "StPeter") would not be presented to a > human user at the same time. > >If we do that, we're no longer dancing around issues.
Splendid idea! Tom _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
