> On Jun 13, 2017, at 6:06 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 6/13/17 4:07 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> This is my AD evaluation of draft-ietf-precis-7613bis-07.
>> 
>> I think this draft is ready for IETF last call, which I will request
>> shortly. I have a few comments, all about references, that I think
>> can be handled along with any last call comments.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Ben. ———————
>> 
>> - Should the references to RFC 7613 in the IANA considerations be
>> updated to point to this document? (Some _say_ “this document”).
> 
> Yes, they should. I actually made that change the other day, along with
> cross-references to 7564bis instead of RFC 7564 (etc.)...
> 
> https://github.com/stpeter/precis-framework/commit/58e4b072f9838fe4cc454594bff2e6e64daaf73b#diff-3956fe36c870ed54d75e6a05394dd92f

Excellent. Hopefully you’ve already fixed any comments that might come up in 
IETF last call or IESG review, too :-)

> 
>> - There are some citations to RFC 4013 and 3545 that seem to be
>> overtaken by events. For example, there is a statement that 4013 is
>> obsoleted by this document, when in fact it was obsoleted by 7613.
>> Please check to make sure that any such citations (and their
>> surrounding context) will still make sense when this draft is
>> published as an RFC.
> 
> Good catch - we'll clean that up. (The references to the older specs
> might be appropriate where we're trying to show the historical
> continuity of thinking on these issues, but not when we're talking about
> which documents this one obsoletes.)
> 

Perfect, thanks!

Ben.

_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis

Reply via email to