On 7/5/17 7:05 AM, Warren Kumari wrote: > Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-precis-7564bis-08: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-precis-7564bis/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks Benoit, the diff was helpful. > > It seems a bit odd to be doing a -bis for a document ~2 years old, and the > draft started <1 year after publication - are we likely to see a -bis of this > newly published doc as soon?
It seems better to fix things (and as you can see the diff is relatively small) than to let them fester or expect people to look at errata. And no, we do not expect to be making any changes to this set of documents anytime soon (e.g., 5+ years). Peter _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
