> On Jul 5, 2017, at 11:50 AM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Taking a page from Benoit's playbook, here is a diff from RFC7613: > https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-precis-7613bis-08.txt&url2=https://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc7613.txt > (I feel really stupid for not re > alizing this earlier, but diff'ing a -bis from > the base RFC is a: obvious and b: really useful for understanding which bits > need more review)
Thanks go to the authors for making the -bis easily “diff-able” from the RFC. Not everyone does that. I’ve been debating whether we should consider some guidance to -bis authors to avoid unnecessary changes that make it difficult to review the changes. (e.g. stylistic changes, unnecessary reorganization, etc.) _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
