On 7/5/17 4:58 PM, Adam Roach wrote: > Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-precis-7613bis-08: Yes > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-precis-7613bis/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Nit: The final paragraph of section 1 is missing a paren after "[RFC7622]". > > Nit: Step 2 in section 4.2.2 cites RFC 4013 as text rather than the normal > citation format of [RFC4013] > > I have the same comment as I did on rfc7700bis regarding the implications of > operation idempotence.
Acknowledged. Peter _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
