On 7/6/17 8:45 AM, John C Klensin wrote: > > > --On Thursday, July 6, 2017 08:38 -0600 Peter Saint-Andre > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Note: IANA is requested to not make further updates to >>>> this registry until the issues described in >>>> [IAB-Statement] and Section 13.5 have been settled. >>> >>> While not an ideal solution (it is not clear to me that there >>> is such a thing), this addition removes my objection to >>> processing (and approving and publishing) the PRECIS >>> documents at this time. >> >> Yes, this seems like the best course. > > Yeah although extrapolation from the ICANN experience with the > IANA IDNA database and the tone of complaints from that > direction in combination with how well we seem to be doing about > processing, and getting meaningful consensus for, I18n documents > more generally, it would be reasonable to translate that > statement as something involving "never".
I hope that's not the case, but I fear you might be right. > Given the statement, > I don't see it as useful to further hold up the PRECIS > documents, especially because they are a clear improvement over > their predecessors, but, IMO, we had better recognize, soon, > that we have a problem and start doing something about it. Very much agreed. Peter _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
