On Thu, Sep 14, 2017, at 21:04, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > What needs fixing? We added explanatory text about idempotence, and > there will also be an example of such in the RFC version.
That is not enough. Someone writing a PRECIS implementation *might* see that. Someone actually using the PRECIS implementation (eg. the author of an XMPP Client, Spotify, etc.) will most likely not see that. If they're lucky, the text will have been copied over into the implementations documentation. That's a lot of "if's". > Please note that these documents are now in AUTH48 (very final edits > before publication). So speak now or forever hold your peace! I brought this up earlier as well. I wanted to bring it up again because the Nickname profile is getting so close to being published again with something that I think is possibly a security concern and that needs to be fixed since we won't have this opportunity again. —Sam _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
