On Thu, Dec 6, 2018, at 10:56, Tom Worster wrote: > My suggestion is that until we understand how the IETF can be useful in > supporting this work, which was my first point, don't bother with > RFC-style formatting. > > Even if the ID would in the future progress on standards track, there's > no clear formatting requirement for test vectors and nobody can argue > with a straight face that torturing the data into the bizarre RFC-type > paginated ascii text format does anyone any good whatsoever. So don't > cross that bridge before someone lets you near it?
I see; temporarily here's a copy of the tests in a JSON representation: https://blog.samwhited.com/rfcs/machinetests.json I'll throw this up somewhere more accessible when I'm next at my desk. —Sam _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
