Well, I suppose it all depends on how similar the D project files are to the C++ ones. I did try to abstract out common functions between the C++ and C# support. The more data points I have to work with, the easier it will be to identify the areas that need more abstraction (and what it should look like).
On Mar 4, 2012, at 4:04 AM, Gour wrote: > Hello! > >> Out of curiosity, do you have any plans to support Visual Studio (i.e. >> Visual D - http://www.dsource.org/projects/visuald)? > > I have contacted Andrew who is working on D support for premake in > regard and he replied: > > "As for Visual Studio, I'd only do it if/when I needed it, and I > (currently) only develop on Linux, so I don't have the burning need. I > would like to add support for Code::Blocks if I ever get the chance. VS > probably wouldn't be all that hard except for all the various versions > etc. and the fact that I would struggle to test it." > > which made me think how hard/easy is to add new langauge support to > premake, iow. how much is language support decoupled from the format > (project files, Makefiles...) support? > > Iow, I wonder if one wants to add support for new language, one has to > write down from scratch all the suppor for different formats as well or > it's possible to take advantage of the current infrastructure as well? > > Does 4.4 change the situation? > > > Sincerely, > Gour ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 _______________________________________________ Premake-users mailing list Premake-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/premake-users
