16.03.2012, 16:31, "Jason Perkins" <star...@industriousone.com>:
> I think you two are in violent agreement, and rapidly getting into
> philosophical territory. It is my intention to fully support the Qt use
> cases, and to maintain Premake's simple style and syntax in the process.
>
> Really basic build rule support is now in premake-dev. Visual Studio 2008
> only (I am hoping to add VS 2010 today), C/C++ only. No token replacement so
> you'll have to rely on Visual Studio's built-in tokens (i.e. $(InputName),
> etc.). Only supports commands and outputs, and both must be specified as
> tables.
>
> configuration "**.xyz"
> buildrule {
> commands = { "xyc -c $(InputFile) -o ($IntDir)$(InputName).obj" },
> outputs = { "$(IntDir)$(InputName).obj" }
> }
>
> This meets the needs of my current project, so it might stay like this for a
> bit while I move the Gmake action over to the new APIs (including build
> rules).
It would still be useful to have a "full" buildrule implementation at least for
VS2008 for the first time (use of Qt with gmake is fully supported by my
current implementation, but VS is not supported at all).
--
Regards,
Konstantin
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________
Premake-users mailing list
Premake-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/premake-users
