-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Dennison wrote: [...] > Git has got much cleaner over time. The first versions in 2005 were > very raw but I was forced to use it for Linux kernel work. Now I think > it is fantastic and avoid SVN as much as possible :)
I use it a little, mostly for personal filesystem repositories for keeping track of changes to arbitrary directories, and while I like its speed and flexibility I do find that it doesn't really work the way I want to work. My workflow usually goes: 1. checkout 2. work on branch 3. check diffs against HEAD 4. individually revert changes I don't want 5. individually commit changes I do want 6. repeat from 4 until done Step 3 is awkward because git doesn't like diffing against the working copy, and wants me to stage the changes first. But if I do that, step 4 becomes rather difficult. It doesn't help that the git Eclipse plugin is still rather broken. Eclipse's SVN plugin is fantastic. I like being able to point at a file, ask it what's changed, then point at an individual change in the file and say, revert that. </grumble> [...] > Oops. This is because I broke convention and haven't pushed up a > "master" branch yet. This fixes it: Yup, works fine. Ta! - -- ┌─── ｄｇ＠ｃｏｗｌａｒｋ．ｃｏｍ ───── http://www.cowlark.com ───── │ │ "They laughed at Newton. They laughed at Einstein. Of course, they │ also laughed at Bozo the Clown." --- Carl Sagan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpCC0kACgkQf9E0noFvlzhW7ACfe/CME2pgFbLfvAr/yCIvrHNI b3gAoKKjTFhzLIeaFh0Mvr1JoGTEXeL1 =MK36 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Prex-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prex-devel
