On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:27 AM, David Given <[email protected]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 14/06/10 20:17, Andrew Dennison wrote:
> [...]
>> Has much changed in this area of Prex since 0.8.1? Maybe there its an
>> issue in 0.9?
>
> I don't know --- I never got this far with 0.8.1. I'm reasonably sure
> that there's some stack corruption in the no-MMU vfork implementation,
> but until (if and when) I can demonstrate it in a vanilla Prex without
> my hacks I don't want to commit myself.
>
> The only other non-MMU port is the GBA one, right? It doesn't build with
> a modern arm-elf, it does build with a modern arm-eabi but then won't
> boot, so I'm now building the ancient gcc 3.4.3 that' actually mentioned
> in the instructions.

Arm integrator and i386 both have non-mmu ports. I've run all four
options (arm integrator and i386 both with and without mmu) using
qemu.

>
> [...]
>> This sounds interesting. The mailing list only accepts patches as
>> inline text. I can make a 0.9 branch available on github if that
>> helps?
>
> Provided it's not too much work, that'd be really helpful.

Done. See the prex branch, there is a prex_090 tag as well.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win: 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Prex-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prex-devel

Reply via email to