On 11 February 2011 14:46, Peter Desnoyers <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm using Prex in an operating systems class this term, and was > wondering if anyone else had tried this. > > I was also wondering whether the project has gone dead, as there are > very few messages on this list since last July.
This sounds like a very good use of Prex, as it has a fairly clean structure and good abstraction of the architecture specific components. The Prex mailing list has always been quiet, but there seem to be a few of us lurking and ready to join in whenever some discussion starts. For the most part we're been just _using_ Prex for the last 6 months or so, it is now nice and stable so our efforts have all been focused on our product rather than more enhancements to Prex. Unfortunately I can't comment on Prex 0.9, as I haven't yet found the time to merge our changes with the latest release. We haven't heard from Kohsuke for a while but I'm sure he is working away adding some interesting features. Andrew ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Prex-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/prex-devel
