Smokers tend to resist antismoking efforts that rely on
"rational" approaches such as taxes, and researchers have
pointed to confounding influences, including social factors addiction.
But differences in smokers' decision-making processes may also be at
pay.



A recent study from the Baylor College of Medicine <http://www.bcm.edu>
found that smokers and nonsmokers react differently to news of how much
they could have made in a stock-market game. The feedback was purely
incidental: it offered no financial incentive to adjust one's
investment strategy, yet nonsmokers were swayed by what might have been
and changed their tactics. Smokers ignored the input, even though they
processed the information in the same part of the brain as their
nonsmoking peers did.

The study does not address whether smokers' behavior is a cause or
an effect of their addictions but rather adds to a growing list of ways
in which human beings sometimes ignore reason when it comes to
decision-making. In the book Predictably Irrational (HarperCollins,
2008), behavioral economist Dan Ariely of the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology catalogues a bevy of errors, biases and otherwise illogical
human behavior. Other behavioral economists are doing the same on the
premise that these absurdities are understandable, and they are just
beginning to team up with neuroscientists to try to tease out the roots
of decision-making biases in the brain.

The hope is that this knowledge will one day inform policy. To combat
smoking, for example, policymakers could "use evidence of what brain
areas are active during the [decision-making] process to design other
strategies" more nuanced than taxation, says behavioral economists
Collin Camerer of the California Institute of Technology.



That field of neuroeconomics is in its infancy, however. Neuroscientist
agree with behavioral economist that in the future it will be possible
to use our irrationalities to our advantage, but as for whether their
work could soon steer policy, "I think it's just too early"
to make a decision, Ariely says.





Happy Learning,





Yovan P. Putra




Reply via email to