> ++ 03-Mar-05 15:04 -0500 - David Willmore:
> > > > Most suckers, sorry consumers, will happily vote for crippled
> > > > systems with their wallets, if both case and price tag are smaller
> > > > and lighter.
> > > 
> > > OT now, but this statement is so predudicial that I feel it needs
> > > comment.  If it fits their needs, why are they suckers?  IMO those who
> > > overspend and get a vastly beefier system than they need (e.g. paying
> > > a 30% premium for a 3.4GHz CPU vs a 3.2GHz CPU) (also getting
> > > something heavier in the case of laptops intended for travel use), are
> > > the real suckers.
> > 
> > I'm guessing Brian is making his reasonable statement based on a few
> > facts which may not be obvious.
> 
> [usage pattern anecdotes snipped]
> 
> > So, you pay more, but you get less.  I think that justifies the 'suckers'
> > comment.
> 
> That's not what he said at all.  He said if you make compromises when
> speccing a machine to get a *lower* price tag or a lighter weight (in
> which case you often pay more and get less on purpose), you're a
> sucker.  That's flat out wrong, as well as insulting.  To suggest that
> a person that buys a machine that meets their specifications but not
> yours is a "sucker" is elitist and egocentric at best.

You're missing that laptops *are* crippled systems if they use modern
processors and still want to remain 'laptops'.  Smaller and lighter
is the key here.  

> > So, the short analogy is that laptops are 'sprinters' while servers
> > are 'long distance' runners.  I'd stick to the latter for mprime 
> > usage.
> 
> Again, this is your specification, but may not work for everyone.
> Personally, I do a lot of heavy lifting on my laptop since I'm often
> on the road without reliable connectivity to my machines at home or
> the office (though connectivity is getting better in general all the
> time, there are still plenty of occasions where I can't reach the
> remote machines or else can't maintain a connection with sufficient
> reliability).

Paul, it's not my specification.  It's an *analogy*.  It is the
industry that has decided that laptops should be built less capable
than servers.  IMHO, it is a very good decision.  People who expect
a laptop to perform like a server are not gripping reality with both
hands.  If you want to run a freight company, buy a truck, not a
motorcycle--unless you want to haul very small freight very quickly.

Cheers,
David n0ymv
_______________________________________________
Prime mailing list
[email protected]
http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime

Reply via email to