On 4/29/06, Hugh S. Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Given the constrained circumstances, doesn't seem to much to worry about. More interesting is: http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/03/15/amd_clearspeed_opteron_maths_co-pro/ That would be a plus...
"Clearspeed says the part consumes no more than 10W yet delivers 250,000 1024-point complex floating point operations each second." How much of a plus? -- Esse quam videri (to be rather than to seem) _______________________________________________ Prime mailing list [email protected] http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime
