Brian Beesley wrote: > If you want to improve on that, then let's try to set up something > where contributions would have to be encrypted, or at least signed, > using a secure cipher. My guess is that spammers wouldn't be bothered > to obtain & register the necessary keys. The idea is that the list > would reject (automatically) inbound messages which weren't encoded or > signed using the contributer's registered key. List members would > receive plain text as at present, so the "silent majority" wouldn't > have to go to any extra effort.
This is way overkill, IMHO. As long as the list is for members-only, 99% of spam will be caught by mailman as coming from a non-member. What I suspect John is talking about is clearing those out of mailman. /Per Jessen, Zürich _______________________________________________ Prime mailing list [email protected] http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime
