[Off topic, but seems to merit a reply]

On Sunday 01 October 2006 18:09, Paul Leyland wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 18:40, Brian Beesley wrote:
> > Sorry but I don't understand this. In fact the universe is finite in
> > content and time
>
> Are you sure of that?

In the sense of a mathematical proof, no. But according to the current 
generally accepted standard cosmological models (Big Bang, string theory) the 
assertion seems to be true.

In particular:

We are unable to track any events prior to the Big Bang (or the local Little 
Bang, in the colliding brane model). So the time we are able to use up to the 
present is indeed finite.

It follows from this that the content of the universe we see is finite, else 
it would have collapsed back to a singularity by now, or at any rate before 
the inflationary effect of the cosmological constant began to overcome 
gravity in the very early, very dense universe.

If - despite the cosmological constant - the Universe does collapse in the 
future, the time we are able to influence would also seem to be finite.

If the universe continues to expand (at an exponentially rapid rate, thanks to 
the cosmological constant) then as matter decays to naked baryons & tachyons, 
black holes evaporate etc. there will come a point when time effectively 
stops as there will be essentially no interactions. (The density of 
fundamental particles will "soon" become rather less than one per a volume 
equal to the current volume of our universe). This will make computing rather 
awkward, combined with the maintenance of any organic life able to use the 
results of any computation.
>
> I look forward to reading your forthcoming paper where you prove that
> claim.

I didn't invent the theories outlined above. In any case, cosmology is 
essentially an observational science whereas quantum physics is a model of 
the behaviour of fundamental particles which seems to explain the observed 
universe rather well but, according to at least some mathematicians better 
than me, seems to be based on unsound mathematics.

Sorry, but I can't provide your proof, now or in the forseeable future. 
Neither could Einstein, Hawking or any of the other great physicists who have 
worked in this area.

If you believe in the Lord God Almighty (or any of his equivalents in the 
other major monotheistic religions) then please try asking Him to reveal His 
proof. Though, as pointed out in the Hitchhikers' Guide to the Galaxy, your 
request may well be denied, as proof denies faith, and without faith God is 
nothing.

Regards
Brian Beesley
_______________________________________________
Prime mailing list
[email protected]
http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime

Reply via email to