This is the life!
I refer to contributing to an E-mail list.
Two days in and I solicit a response from from the horse's mouth
by broadcasting a silly oversight!

> At 08:55 AM 10/24/2006, david eddy wrote:
> >I'm mystified.
> >
> >The number of factors of 2^p - 1 to try up to 2^m goes as (2^m)/p
> >Why don't the times follow suit?
> 
> Both are correct.  You are right there are twice as many factors to test.
> However, the benchmark times how long it takes to test a small fixed
> size subset of factors of that size.

In his haste to delete the table of times, George also deleted:

<<
 When I did the benchmark test in Prime95 (v24.14), the screen output asserted 
that
 all these times referred to factoring M35,000,011.
>>

This is the first of the two items in "both" I presume.

> 
> >The only feature I understand is the jump at 64 bits, since the division
> >suddenly gets harder.
> 
> Again you are correct. 

Welcome back from your vacation.
I note that your list of "available" double check exponents started at 
18,000,000.
Consulting primenet, their allocation is already well into these.

THX

David Eddy
_________________________________________________________________
Be one of the first to try Windows Live Mail.
http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-4911fb2b2e6d
_______________________________________________
Prime mailing list
[email protected]
http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime

Reply via email to