On Thursday 14 December 2006 15:50, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 02:44:54PM +0000, Brian Beesley wrote: > > Also, the "special features" of the transform used for the L-L test give > > us the "subtract 2" part of the L-L algorithm for free; this may > > interfere in some way with the exact equality mentioned in the basic > > theory. > > What? This is new to me. How does that happen? (I assume this isn't a typo > for the modulo part?)
Ok... (1) I did write "may" rather than "does"; (2) where is the -2 done? (3) the modulo operation may have an effect too. Though thinking about it I can see how the -2 can be done easily enough whilst in "real space" between iterations. Sorry for any confusion. Regards Brian Beesley _______________________________________________ Prime mailing list [email protected] http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime
