Raymond Fung wrote:

> If "reliability" is important, why not move to Linux !!! 

+1. 

I can't comment much on the Windows-based proposal other than the talk
about "a server" seems like a bad plan.  For high-reliability it ought
to be an N+1 setup. 


/Per Jessen, Zürich

_______________________________________________
Prime mailing list
[email protected]
http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime

Reply via email to