Don't see this as a HIPAA Privacy Rule requirement. In fact, until there is an alternative individual identifier, each plan or provider assigning a proprietary number to identify an individual creates even more confusion than we currently have. Especially in COB situations. But, are you in California? California recently passed SB 168 regarding the use of SS#'s. However, the law does allow use of SS# for "internal verification or administrative purposes." This is what most plans or providers use the SS# for anyway. What it will require is for a plan or provider to take a look at notifications sent or ID cards used. Have your counsel take a look at this bill or similar bills proposed in other states. Essentially, you can prepare a response that states you are permitted to use SS# in certain limited situations, such as eligibility and claims payment.
>>> "Waterhouse, Melissa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/05/02 09:33AM >>> Recently, we have been experiencing resistance from members when we request their social security number and the numbers of their dependents. Several letters from employees quote The Privacy Act. We are considering not requiring dependents socials but this could negatively impact HEDIS numbers since SSN's are the only way to track continuous enrollment. I am wondering if other health plans are also experiencing this and if they decided to not require social security numbers or have moved to using another identifier. Thank you, Melissa Waterhouse SummaCare Health Plan ********************************************************************** To be removed from this list, go to: http://snip.wedi.org/unsubscribe.cfm?list=privacy and enter your email address. ********************************************************************** To be removed from this list, go to: http://snip.wedi.org/unsubscribe.cfm?list=privacy and enter your email address.
