If it is an ERISA plan, refer to ERISA Regulation Section 2569.503-1(b)(4). I would also distinguish between personal representative for care vs. authorized representative for obtaining payment from a health plan. As I previously noted, there are always exceptions, QMCSO, COBRA (each qualified beneficiary is essentially an active participant) and emancipated minors(although some plans will not cover if they are no longer a dependent.) The DOL basically leaves it up to plans to determine who will be considered an authorized representative for obtaining payment from the plan. You'll need to get your own counsel's opinion on what are sufficient procedures. Good luck. >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04/25/02 10:29AM >>> As a health plan, we are currently looking intensely at this issue and would appreciate any information you could provide on where your documentation came from regarding the use of plan language to state that the primary life is automatically an authorized representative for all covered dependents. What is the specific Department of Labor regulation referred to in your email? What legislation have you located that would allow a plan to determine who an authorized representative would be in relation to HIPAA criteria as designated in the sections regarding the "individual" and "personal representatives"? Our research has not led us to any opinions where this would meet HIPAA privacy regulations and we are interested in pursuing all avenues in this area. Current research: (1) Parents are their minor children's
personal representatives. (2) Parents cannot be considered personal representatives for unemancipated minor children in regard to treatment in which the law gives the minor the authority to act as an individual in regard to a health care service. The definition of payment under section 164.501 states that payment activities relate to the "individual to whom health care is provided", which came about as an HHS response to comments. "Comment: Some commenters argued that the definition of 'payment' should be narrowly interpreted as applying only to the individual who is the subject of the information. Response: We agree with the commenter and modify the definition to clarify that payment activities relate to the individual to whom health care is provided." Issues: 1. Children who exceed the age of
minority in the state of residence as their own personal representatives.
3. Members and spouses as their own personal representatives. Questions to be resolved: OR While this is a lengthy email, this issue has become a hot topic of discussion/review in workgroups in which we participate and we look forward to any comments that would assist our research as we work toward a resolution in this area. Thank you, Debra Maher -----Original Message----- Plan language and/or claims policy will help to clarify this
issue. It >>> "Ken Hoover" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/01/02 07:49AM >>> Your responses to this matter is very much appreciated. Thanks, **********************************************************************
**********************************************************************
********************************************************************** To be removed from this list, go to: http://snip.wedi.org/unsubscribe.cfm?list=privacy and enter your email address. ********************************************************************** To be removed from this list, go to: http://snip.wedi.org/unsubscribe.cfm?list=privacy and enter your email address. |
- Privacy Question Re: EOBs/Checks Ken Hoover
- Privacy Question Re: EOBs/Checks David Blasi
- RE: Privacy Question Re: EOBs/Checks David Blasi
- RE: Privacy Question Re: EOBs/Checks Debra . Maher
- RE: Privacy Question Re: EOBs/Checks Bill Bernath
