I didn't really about the name that much (unless it's overly verbose). The problem I tried to mention was the attitude of other developers to such a simple addition.
Karol On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Tord Romstad <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Svante Carl v. Erichsen > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I should call it string-conc, conc-string, or conc->string. > > I actually agree. What I meant is that if you really want to use a > mathematical operator for this, multiplication is the natural choice. > Your suggestions above -- at least the first two -- are of course > better still. > > Tord > > _______________________________________________ > pro mailing list > [email protected] > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro > _______________________________________________ pro mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro
