Hi, did you consider using swank protocol?
Vsevolod On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Yakov Zaytsev <zaytsev.ya...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hello, all > > I again have a scenario as follows. Say, you have an enterprise-y or > CAD-y application. From one side, you extend it in Lisp. Be it a > plugin (i.e. LISPWORKS:DELIVER with :DLL-EXPORTS) or standalone Lisp > process which communicates with the application via some provided SDK > APIs; these two cases do not actually differ for us. > From the other side, you have your own fat Lisp application which you > want to communicate with the plugin. Example: NPAPI plugin provides > data for later processing by big Lisp. > Here is a problem arises. How to pass sexps as transparently between > the two Lisps as possible? Yeah, I programmed in Erlang for some time. > Basically, I want that kind of "transparency", though I don't thing > that it definitely must be message passing between quasi-processes.. > There are might be some variations but I guess you got the idea > > _______________________________________________ > pro mailing list > pro@common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro >
_______________________________________________ pro mailing list pro@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro
