On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 16:00:56 -0700 David McClain <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm getting more deeply involved in Bignum prime-field and Elliptic Curve > computations. Wonder if anyone knows the degree to which the Bignum support > in Lisp is enhanced, in the sense that multiple algorithms can be used for, > e.g., multiplication, depending on bignum operand sizes. FFT's over integer > fields for large numbers, Montgomery multiplication elsewhere, etc.?? > > I just reviewed GnuMP docs and saw a fairly sophisticated collection of > internal optimizations. Would it pay to migrate to GnuMP for specialized > applications? I unfortunately don't have much number crunching or cryptography experience using Lisp, but perhaps of help might be that ECL uses libgmp as part of its math operators implementation, and that there exists a suite of cryptographic utilities, some of which might be useful for benchmarking (including RSA which needs bignums), called Ironclad (http://www.cliki.net/Ironclad). I'd definitely also try SBCL as a lot of effort is put on its performance. I'm unsure if SBCL native bignum performance is worse or better than C+libgmp, or if the overhead necessary to wrap libgmp through CFFI would be worth the try. The C cryptography suite I'm most familiar with (OpenSSL) uses its own bignum library; it's possible that it might be specially optimized for the limited use cases of its cryptographic needs and might also be worth looking at (it does include montgomery multiplication). -- Matt _______________________________________________ pro mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro
