On Oct 9, 2012, at 07:52 , Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote: > IMO, you will have to see what's done by each implementation, and use > implementation specific, perhaps even internal functions to get that > information. > > This would be a good subject for a CDR, to provide a public introspective API.
I second that. A "side" CDR would be to specify other "function specifiers" beside (SETF FOO). Cheers -- MA > > -- > __Pascal Bourguignon__ > > > On 08/10/2012, at 15:28, Didier Verna <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Hello, >> >> I cannot find a standard way to figure out whether a setf expander has >> been defined for a symbol FOO (via either DEFSETF or >> DEFINE-SETF-EXPANDER). >> >> Is there one? Otherwise, I would also be happy with an SBCL-only >> solution. >> >> >> Thank you ! >> >> -- >> Resistance is futile. You will be jazzimilated. >> >> Scientific site: http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier >> Music (Jazz) site: http://www.didierverna.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pro mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro > > _______________________________________________ > pro mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro -- Marco Antoniotti, Associate Professor tel. +39 - 02 64 48 79 01 DISCo, Università Milano Bicocca U14 2043 http://bimib.disco.unimib.it Viale Sarca 336 I-20126 Milan (MI) ITALY Please note that I am not checking my Spam-box anymore. Please do not forward this email without asking me first. _______________________________________________ pro mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro
