On 14 December 2017 at 23:27, Steve Haflich <[email protected]> wrote: > Just keep in mind that some of the items on the CLiki list propose changes > (divergences from) current normative ANSI CL requirements, and that others > are simply drafted sloppily. These changes would not have automatically > passed review under the original X3J13 process, and no one should assume > their long life on the CLiki page means they would be uncontroversial.
Yes, and the actual errata was listed at the bottom of that page. I took all of them and set up a new page, organized by chapter and with proper links: http://www.cliki.net/CLHS%20Errata If the community feels this is fine, I will remove the errata section from the earlier page and link to this one instead. Chaitanya > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 4:04 AM, Don Morrison <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> When I reported an error I’d noticed in the HyperSpec to Lispworks three >> years ago their response pointed me at the CLiki page, so I suspect that is >> probably the best source of errata available. And, more importantly, that >> response seems to imply they have no interest in updating the HyperSpec. >> That said, I remain grateful to them that it is available, even in its >> ossified form. >> >> >> -- >> Don Morrison <[email protected]> >> “We are not an endangered species ourselves yet, but this >> is not for lack of trying.” >> — Douglas Adams, /Last Chance to See/ >> >
