Other than the minor inconvenience of having to issue a "ln -sf" command, I fail to see how this is a big problem. How often do you really emerge a new kernel?
Also, keep in mind that every time you emerge additional kernel sources, you need to remerge any packages that build kernel modules so that these modules are built for the new kernel. Take nvidia-glx for example; if you have gentoo-sources and rt-sources installed, you will have to emerge nvidia-glx once for each kernel. As such, changing the /usr/src/linux symlink around isn't necessarily a bad thing.
- Colin
On 5/26/06, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
After emerging rt-sources this evening as a test of the new -rt
patches I found there was a new link in /usr/src point at
linux-2.6.16-rt25.
1) Was this created by emerge rt-sources? IT seems ot be based on
dates and times:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 May 26 17:26 linux -> linux-2.6.16-rt25
drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 4096 May 26 17:26 linux-2.6.16-rt25
2) Do others agree with me that if it was created by emerge rt-sources
that it should NOT be?
Just because I emerge a new kernel source tree does not mean I want
it to become the default kernel source for the system. Since other
emerges reference this link to tell it what code to build for
different modules, such as realtime-lsm or video adapters, I want to
make sure I control this link and not emerge.
Long term this will cause problems if the kernel pointed to doesn't
match the default kernel that's booted by grub after a cold boot.
Comments?
Thanks,
Mark
