Re: [proaudio] Can we please have a nondaw ebuild?

[Damien Moody]

If it works, I don't care how it's spelled. I think the "working" part is the deal-sealer. ;-) wayne wrote: On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 00:55 +0300, Alexandros Diamantidis wrote: * Gavin Pryke [2009-09-15 19:34]: > On Tuesday 15 September 2009 17:49:01 Ulrich Lorenz Schlüter wrote: > > Can we please have a nondaw ebuild? > > I've made an ebuild for this based on nonsequencer-9999. Thanks for this, but wouldn't it be a bit more consistent to name the ebuilds "non-daw" and "non-sequencer"? Seeing that the projects' web sites, mailing list archives and executables all have them with a hyphen, I would expect the ebuilds to be spelled with a hyphen as well. Alexandros +1