Dear Listees
This is the first in an occasional series of newsletters for Prodig in 2003.
[and although we do like your feedback, please only send replies
off-list...thanks]
PRODIG breaks 1,000 !!!
Yes the last day of January 2003 and Prodig now has over one thousand
members worldwide....Yay!
PRODIG ITEMS for SALE
On our web site we have offered over the last year free classified
ads for privates sales.
Its simple, its easy, and it seems IT WORKS judging from the feedback
you give us.
To see it in action go to ..... www.prodig.org
PRODIG ANNEX
This is our message board, where you can post informations and
answers to queries. Divided into useful topic areas and very
searchable.
It also offers useful extra ways to communicate with one another,
with personal messaging that does not reveal your email address, if
you register as a user.
It has excellent potential for posting details of events, trade shows
and seminars worldwide.
You will make it something great by using it, so please visit....
www.prodig.org
NEW MEMBERS
As you might guess by our growth, we welcome many new members to Prodig.
All information about using your subscription, or changing to the
Digest is on the the Prodig web site.... www.prodig.org
Our newest Guidelines are also to be found first on the web site, so
please read carefully before posting to the List.
_/_/_/
Well that's it for now. I hope to put another newsletter out between
now and Easter.
In the meantime if you have any questions please ask a Listmom.
--
Best
ED HORWICH
ProDIG Listowner
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* ProDIG website http://www.prodig.org
* Association of Photographers http://www.aophoto.co.uk
* Pacificstream sponsors Prodig http://www.pacificstream.com
===============================================================
GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
- [PRODIG] RE:low-res digital cameras are not adequate for... Jorge Parra
- Re: [PRODIG] RE:low-res digital cameras are not ade... Philip Chudy
- Re: [PRODIG] RE:low-res digital cameras are not ade... william.curwen
- [PRODIG] RE:low-res digital cameras are not adequat... Jorge Parra
- [PRODIG] RE:low-res digital cameras are not adequat... Jeff Schewe
- Re: [PRODIG] RE:low-res digital cameras are not... Shangara Singh
- Re: [PRODIG] RE:low-res digital cameras are... Michael Wilkinson
- RE: [PRODIG] RE:low-res digital cameras are not... Derek Cooper
- Re: [PRODIG] RE:low-res digital cameras are not... Conor Masterson
- Re: [PRODIG] RE:low-res digital cameras are... Paul Fawley
- [PRODIG]Demise of the Fuji 680?? Paul Fawley
- Re: [PRODIG]Demise of the Fuji 680... Steve Bradshaw
- Re: [PRODIG]Demise of the Fuji... Paul Fawley
- Re: [PRODIG]Demise of the ... Steve Bradshaw
