I have used the Sinarback with CeMYGK (binuscan engine specially intergrated with sinar). This is a auto batch processed version but the algorithm in the engine is the same with PRP. The results were more than impressive. the only drawback to the CeMYGK system is that you can only optimize images shot with a linear curve. once you get used to shooting with a linear curve, the results are absolutly stunning... the local colour contrast are what i have never seen before. with an image that i thought was perfect... the CeMYGK could pull out even more colour and details and contrast... it brings imaging to a new level...
after playing with PRP, i must say that PRP is definitely more flexiblethan CeMYGK and can be used with any camera... i would have gotten it if i had not plonked the same amount for CeMYGK has anyone any thoughts about shooting in a studio with a linear curve or with a S curve or for that matter with any form of curve? I would say that it is a piece of software that photographers cannot do without... well once u have tasted it... you will not be able to live without it :) ---------------------- Alfred H. Tay +65.9.271.6380 http://alfred.sperio.com > I had quite a good try at using PRP1.06 a while ago, but I guess I was a bit > too used to Photoshop (since the first Mac version! :-)) ... I did however > only really look at the image editing side of its functionality. > > It was a nice package to use, and looked easier to learn from scratch than > PhotoShop. I'd welcome any comments on its relative quality with various > operations, especially with Version 2 now available: > <http://www.binuscan.com/us/prp/version2.html> > =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
