There has just been a most revealing press release from Kodak about and
upgrade to the DCS 14n which announces that

>�Kodak's Pro 14n camera with 512MB RAM ideal for commercial, portrait
corporate, event and other professional photographers who
>>>shoot in controlled-lighting or more brightly lit environments or at lower
ISO settings is priced only slightly higher than the original Pro 14n camera
equipped with 256MB RAM.�

It would appear that Kodak are beginning to re-define the capabilities of
the 14n - having told us that this would be a revolutionary piece of kit we
are now getting some reality after months of uncertainty.

Although they have made fantastic improvements in many areas there are still
some major issues. It is quite clear that this will never be a high ASA
camera and Kodak still have to resolve issues affecting the colour
management of th camera.

When the camera first appeared it had an white balance �Auto� setting of
about 4,400K. and a �Standard Daylight� of 5,000K. There was a real magenta
bias which seemed to stem from this imbalance as when the temperature was
corrected in PhotoDesk or simply with PhotoShop �Auto-Levels this would
clean up.

Now I am not a technical expert but it seems to me to be common sense that
the basis of any decent digital image needs to start with the correct data -
to have a digital capture programme based on an incorrect colour temperature
means that there is either a problem with the actual chip or there has been
a damn stupid mistake.

Either has serious implications. Kodak has since corrected the �Standard
Daylight� but not the �Auto� setting and they also produced what they
patronizingly call a �goodie� which is a software gizmo for changing the
apperance of your shot. Really just a filter; if you are a wedding
photographer and want to tint your shot sepia, fine.  But it is just a
cosmetic fix which does not actually address what I now think is an
underlying problem with the camera.

Kodak have failed to activate a colour temperture adjustment facility which
is clearly outlined in the instruction manual. I have raised this point on a
number of occasions and have never received any explanation whatsoever for
their failure to introduce what seems a pretty basic facility.

Two weeks ago I asked for a specific assurance that this facility would be
enabled and have received no reply. There is no reason I suppose why Kodak
should make me party to their development plans but when one is merely
asking about a feature which was promised a year ago then I think the
silence on this matter suggests they have a major problem.

Given Kodaks refusal to even discuss the colour management issues and their
seeming reliance on software patches by way of cosmetic �Looks� applied post
process I am convinced that they have a basic hardware problem with the CMOS
chip which restricts development in certain areas.

If they have made a basic error about colour temperature, then all their
subsequent software processing will be based upon that faulty premise and
that has implications for virtually every single subsequent programme line
they write. To correct the basic fault right now would possibly improve the
basic colour rendition but it would also render every single line of
firmware written since then liable to error.

I must admit this is my own speculation but as Kodak steadfastly refuse to
even discuss this matter I can only make conjecture and I hope will be
proved wrong.

I think Kodak have served both themselves and their customers very poorly by
allowing their marketing hype to force the technical development to have
been done in such a heated and pressured atmosphere and compel them to bring
such an ill-prepared piece of kit to market. The fact is their credibility
was under threat if they did not produce the camera and sadly for them it
has been under threat ever since. The fact that so many up-grades have been
required since then merely goes to suggest that at its initial launch, the
14n was a total abrogation by Kodak of their basic responsibility as a
manufacturer to provide a product fit for the purpose for which they were
selling it. 

To be honest this is actually a very good camera - if, at the time of its
launch,  Kodak had made appropriate claims for its capabilities along the
lines of "shoot in a studio only" then there would be no problem but to
limit our expectations now is too late.
 
Taken at face value this statement is a pretty radical shift in their
position as to the capabilities of the 14n. They have never pretended that
this was an ideal fast ASA camera but the words �controlled-lighting� are
quite amazing after all the hype of the past year.

Not only they have damaged their own credibility but the implications of
this latest statement is that they have short-changed the photograpghers
like myself who have bought the camera in all good faith and then abttled to
get it to work in all the varied conditions which we work in as
professionals. Whilst I have no doubt whatsoever that the camera will
continue to be improved by firmware upgrades I now have real concerns about
the technical constraints of the equipment they have chosen to use and
whether this will limit future development.

It appears to me that the recent announcement is really not a good sign - if
they are now going to present this camera as a fairly staid �good light�
camera we can forget about them ever bothering to present us with improved
speeds or colour management facilities.

That will be sad as I personally have been getting some good results from
the camera and I know that some of the technical people have been having
sleepless nights trying to get the 14n to live up to all the launch hype.

I have two bodies and desperately want them to be the basis of my shooting
in years to come but I find Kodak�s refusal to answer simple questions about
why they cannot implement very basic trailed features of the camera really
rather disturbing.


Mike St Maur Sheil

T> + 44 (0) 1367 870 276
F> + 44 (0) 1367 870 641
M> + 44 (0) 7860 508 679

W> www.sheilphoto.co.uk
----------------------------



===============================================================
GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE

Reply via email to