On 14/6/04 2:31 PM, Keith Cooper wrote >> I've never understood why this hasn't always been the case. We would, at a >> stroke, be rid of the Walter Mitty's that pick up a camera & think that they >> know it all. > > And just how would you define your ProDIG membership rules?
Dear Fellows. The way ProDig is handled is by basically offering people with diferent levels and different approaches,(and who are accepting and willing to comply with the Guidelines) ,the opportunity to exchange info, and this should be it. Going any farther than that may collide with some filtering criteria that may do more harm than good to the list . Also, manners and netiquette is something that may or may not be present in a full time professional anyway. OTOH, we should then have some sort of selection commitee with some sort of selection criteria to choose which ones go in and which ones don't go to the list. Who is willing to donate time for this matters, and to others duties that would be helpful for ProDig??. Please raise your hands( and write privately) about this. One More time, Admin Notices are NOT to be dealt as threads for online discussion. PLEASE, DO NOT RESPOND ON LIST!! In the meantime, ListMums have been giving a massive revamping to the Guidelines, which will see the light of day soon, and new options are being looked after to improve the list in different ways. Stay tuned and keep the focus on Digital issues. Thanks for your cooperation and participation in ProDig. Regards Jorge Parra On Duty ProDig ListMum =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
