Bearing in mind that opening a RAW file in PSCS allows you to have a file of 144MB then a resize down is more likely.
Having said that I have tried chucking a full 144MB file as well as optimised files at a 2100 and generally they both come out really well. Not sure I can tell the difference.
No doubt some might say you could be highly specific and choose an optimal res for your given size of output (based on input). Personally, I think you get great results either way.
regards
Richard
On 10 Sep 2004, at 17:14, Stefanie Kappel wrote:
But this would mean you have to resample? Let's assume you scan your slides
with the highest resolution possible you will very likely end up with a much
bigger size at 240ppi than you can print on your paper. So then you just
resample in image size?
Alfred
In theory you should print a file of 240ppi on Epson printers, anything higher can be a waste of time.
=============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
