It's all just a matter of opinion old son. There is no research proof one
way or the other.

Richard


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard
Earney
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 3:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PRODIG] PS7 RAW Batch Processor/C1

Richard and Fernand

I don't think you (Richard) can be quite so dogmatic (this is becoming 
like Mac/PC!)
Bruce Fraser's book and Jeff Schewe's articles on Imaging Revue offer a 
massive insight into Camera RAW. Lots of users also swear by C1 and 
believe it is superior.

However there aren't a huge number of comparisons online. I would still 
like to see more evidence from the latest versions (Fernand - got it 
right this time - apologies for before) rather than assertions that it 
is better.

As a PS CS user I naturally have experience of Camera RAW. I have tried 
C1 but am not a fan of the interface and feel that, so far, it gets in 
the way of producing great results.

But I am prepared to be convinced!!!! :)

regards

Richard Earney

--
www.method-photo.co.uk

On 18 Oct 2004, at 14:05, Richard wrote:

> Totally subjective my dear sir and thus not worth the screen paper 
> it's written on.
>
> Better read Bruce Frasiers book on Adobe RAW then come back and admit 
> your mistake.
>
> Richard
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "FernandIvaldi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 10:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [PRODIG] PS7 RAW Batch Processor/C1
>
>
>> Dear Anthony,
>>
>> Have a look at:
>>
>> http://www.lashier.com/home.cfm?dir_cat=20503&gal_col=2
>>
>> Hope this will convince you.
>>
>> Best Regards.
>>
>> Fernand<>Ivaldi
>>
>> Le 18 oct. 04, � 11:08, Anthony Harrison a �crit :
>>
>>> Assertions are all very well, but I don't actually recall seeing any 
>>> detailed explanation about exactly how C1 is better.
>>
>> ===============================================================
>> GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS 
>> for SALE
>> ---
>> [This E-mail has been scanned for viruses but it is your 
>> responsibility to maintain up to date anti virus software on the 
>> device that you are
>> currently using to read this email. ]
>>
>>
>
>
> ---
> [This E-mail has been scanned for viruses but it is your 
> responsibility to maintain up to date anti virus software on the 
> device that you are
> currently using to read this email. ]
>
> ===============================================================
> GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS 
> for SALE
>


===============================================================
GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for
SALE
---
[This E-mail has been scanned for viruses but it is your responsibility 
to maintain up to date anti virus software on the device that you are
currently using to read this email. ]




---
[This E-mail has been scanned for viruses but it is your responsibility 
to maintain up to date anti virus software on the device that you are
currently using to read this email. ]


===============================================================
GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE

Reply via email to