>> Stephen,
I'm using Photoshop CS. <<

OK, v5.x had a bug which delivered too high ink with RelCol transforms...
So this is not the cause for your high ink values.


>> The black (background) in the headshots is mostly 100% black and then I
just
Image -> Mode -> CMYK with our own Standard EURO profile that we got from
the guy that installed our scanner (colour management isn't what it should
be) <<

The is the "culprit"...it is the profile by the sounds of things.
So you have a "custom, personal, standard" euro profile...???
You don't have any luck with the Adobe v2 profiles or ECI profiles etc???


>> What exactly do you mean by saying "you need to know the grey balance"?
<<

Every CMYK process (ink/paper + other variables) has a different grey
balance - the mixture of CMY which creates a neutral grey!
SWOP like conditions vary from highlight to shadow, this is not a linear
response.

*** So, it is pointless converting to CMYK expecting to get a neutral grey
CMYK print - if the CMY+K ratio of inks is not grey balanced for the
process in question. ***

Try a Google search for grey balance....

http://www.naa.org/technews/tn980506/p27gray.htm



>> The Cyan is indeed higher when converted, mainly visible in the lighter
areas. <<

Yes, this sounds correct for most inks/stock etc.


>> The values for a 99% black background convert to C=61M=47Y45K=99, I've
tried the GCR, and it worked, I held everything over 300% but can I be sure
that
this will print correct? <<
What do you mean here???
How did you "try GCR"??? What have you done!!!???

The old legacy Custom CMYK of Photoshop where one can change GCR ratios is
no the same as the newer proper ICC profiles - they are separating to
different standards and do not deliver the same aimpoint/results by
default as other profiles.

***  So, it can be pointless converting a monotone image to CMYK, EVEN if
you have correct grey balance - as the GCR ratio may not be high enough ***
(see the recent posts by Ellie Kennard)...

>> Wan't there be some sort of "artifacts" starting to
appear, spots?... I dunno though,.. <<

I don't know what you mean here...it does not sound good though!

Regards,

Stephen Marsh.


===============================================================
GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE

Reply via email to