Martin Aspeli wrote: > > Florian Schulze and I have been working on such a thing called > archetypes.schemaextender. It requires a slightly different pattern to > ContentFlavors (you need to subclass fields, basically), but it's > working pretty well. >
This looks really helpful. A few questions: (1) Do the current Archetypes fields not allow retrieving accessors and mutators in the same way the new ExtensionField does? (2) Why is it necessary to register a *named* adapter? (3) How is this supposed to work on templates, where we can't just do "context/getTagField"? Is the idea to use views? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANN%3A-archetypes.schemaextender-1.0a1-tf4626771s20094.html#a13569307 Sent from the Product Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Product-Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/product-developers
