Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Right now we have one solution: skin layers. Until the new stuff is used
that is what people should be using. Consistent, flexible, and well
documented.
For the record, I disagree with this (and so does my book).
I think browse views are vastly superior to skin layer templates,
because they give you a sensible place to put view logic. Last I
checked, they do cache in CacheFu as well.
Browser views do cache. Browser resources do not.
True that. I wonder how hard it'd be to fix, since we fixed it for views?
Style sheets and images don't, and people may prefer skin layers.
Style sheets often want DTML, which is not supported in browser
resources.
Indeed. Although DTML there is fairly nasty anyway. :)
Martin
--
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book
_______________________________________________
Product-Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/product-developers
