Yes, though from what I can tell the persistent storage will not be guaranteed never to fail, it's just less likely to happen.
2008/7/16 David Bain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Laurence, > I suppose until the persistent storage is made available it's a case > by case basis. There are some projects I can think of that would work > using that model. > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 5:24 AM, Laurence Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Jon Stahl wrote: >>> >>> David Bain wrote: >>>> I'm currently running plone on an ec2 instance, my concern is that it >>>> only has 1.4 GB so if my ZODB gets too big I'm in trouble. anyone with >>>> experience using ZODB/S3/EC2? I'd love some guidelines. >>>> >>> David- >>> >>> Until amazon rolls out their persistent storage solution later this >>> year, you probably don't want to do a real production deployment on EC2. >>> >>> http://aws.typepad.com/aws/2008/04/block-to-the-fu.html >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/View?docID=dhh4z6n4_96w387mqhn&revision=_latest >>> >>> have some interesting reading to get you ready. >>> >>> :jon >>> >>> >> >> The /mnt partition has 147GB of space. >> >> I have my buildout run repozo and upload to s3, and a deployment script that >> downloads everything from s3 and reconstructs the Data.fs. This all seems to >> work quite nicely and for my purposes is good enough - I can afford to lose >> 10 minutes of changes. >> >> Laurence >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://n2.nabble.com/Plone-on-EC2-S3-and-ZODB-tp529967p530646.html >> Sent from the Product Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Product-Developers mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/product-developers >> > _______________________________________________ Product-Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/product-developers
