Hedley Roos, on 2008-08-11: > Hi all > > My question applies to schemaextender and multiple named adapters for > the same type. > > Both extenders just juggle the order of the fields, so they are > OrderableSchemaExtenders. Is there a way to let one "win", or be > applied last?
If Wichert says "No" I am inclined to believe him. :-) But still: If they were both not reordering things but just adding a field, then the field of the extender mentioned *first* will end up *last* as I found out for a client. This was contrary to what I expected and might of course be an implementation detail of schemaextender, prone to change. -- Maurits van Rees | http://maurits.vanrees.org/ Work | http://zestsoftware.nl/ "This is your day, don't let them take it away." [Barlow Girl] _______________________________________________ Product-Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/product-developers
