Tarek Ziadé writes: > Daniel Nouri and Gillou wrote: >> >>>> Is there an extra/3rd party widgets directory anywhere ? >>>> Associated question : if I develop a widget for plone.app.z3cform, are >>>> there some common naming (...) rules for such components? >>>> Thanks again to the xx.z3cform >> >>>For third party widgets, I'd suggest we use a common namespace as >>>suggested by Martin, but maybe sans the "plone" and with "z3c" in it. >>>I'd expect third party widgets to land in the collective, so maybe >>>"collective" instead of "plone". And "z3c" to avoid confusion with >>>existing formlib implementations. What about >>>"collective.z3cform.mywidget", then? >> > > I'd suggest making a template in ZopeSkel or in a dedicated package, > like what I did for buildout recipes. > > You will be able to set the proper metadata (like keywords) for all > those packages to make it easier to find at PyPI, and later on at > plone.org. This will also help widget creators I guess.
+1 -- http://danielnouri.org _______________________________________________ Product-Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/product-developers
