Refernce fields stored both local object data and data in the
reference catalog I believe so it's no harder to lose data than any
other way.
Dylan Jay
Technical solution manager
PretaWeb 99552830
On 21/12/2009, at 9:46 PM, Simone Orsi <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi list,
I have to develop a product which has two archetypes: one
"container_object" which can be considered as a big "false" container
and one which can be considered as a simple_object to be related to
the
container_object.
I can't make the container_object a real container, such as a folder,
because I need to create a lot of container_objects that can relate
the
same simple_objects' set.
When the user creates a container_object I want him/her to be able to
assign to it as many simple_objects as he/she wants. The number of
related simple_objects can vary from 15 to 200+. The view of the
container_object will show the list of all the simple_objects
related to it.
My question is: will be reliable a referenceField with such number of
relations? I'm a bit scared about the ease of losing objects'
relation.
In my case would mean a real catastrophe :(
Is a referenceFied the way to go?
TIA,
SimO
_______________________________________________
Product-Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/product-developers
_______________________________________________
Product-Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/product-developers
