Wichert Akkerman wrote: > > You could also simply add a method to the content type class itself. > There is no requirement to use adapters - python has a nice class system > you can use as well. Writing an adapter when you will never adapt more > than one specific class is needless overhead imho. > This would mean that I had to subclass Dexteritiy's folder or item class in order to create a custom class, wouldn't it? But isn't this discouraged?
-- View this message in context: http://plone.293351.n2.nabble.com/What-s-the-proper-way-to-add-methods-to-dexterity-types-tp4992210p4992796.html Sent from the Product Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Product-Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/product-developers
