-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mike Metcalfe wrote: > On 14 May 2010 13:52, Andreas Jung <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Data can be cataloged and data can be easily validated. DGF is working > great for us in various projects. If you make such claims about DGF then > please with some evidence. > > I worked on a project a couple of years ago where we used them > extensively. Most of the data was date related and I remember writing > complex validation functions and struggling with date range queries. > Admittedly I haven't had a look at them recently.
Dust and smoke...we have implemented various validations - even for dates in non-US formats..in general such validations can be complex - independent of the widget used. - -aj -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkvthNUACgkQCJIWIbr9KYx9qQCeLInRqpMWTvT29D7Io0wpQ+6+ XHEAn2JcS666+3fHLdJhug8E3cS3yXU9 =aRjn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<<attachment: lists.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ Product-Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/product-developers
