On 2010-07-09, at 2258, Josh Johnson wrote: > I'll probably call it collective.jqplot or plone.jqplot
The plone.* namespace is reserved for code owned by the Plone foundation, unless you're developing it in the Plone core repository with a view for inclusion in core please don't call it that. > So given your logic here, should my package be two packages? Three? One for > just the javascript (collective.js.jqplot), and the other for the > abstraction library (blitzen.plonejqplot or collective.jqplot, etc)? Another > for the demo browser view? Personally I'd call it collective.jqplot. You're doing an rich product that happens to use a JavaScript library, that library is probably not going to be widely used independently. It would be a waste of your time splitting this into multiple products, imho. Matthew _______________________________________________ Product-Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/product-developers
