> From: Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Of course, the point was that this defeats the "advantage" of having > the compiler do your type checking for you! You think that you're > calling setanswer() with one thing, but you're actually calling > another, completely different method, and the compiler will happily > let you do so.
I don't agree with you on this, at least in .NET terms. Intellisence pops up to allow you to see all the overloads of setanswer(), you can step through them and they report what your passing. If your not familiar with the method just "Go to Definition" and investigate from there. In my experience of working with others code, this has never been a confusing area at all. Actually it's been straight forward with or without documentation ;-> _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
