> > I read it, but it left me thinking of Peter Drucker's admonition: 
> > "it's far better to know what to do then what not to do". That is,
we 
> > can examine what's wrong and how things got that way until the cows 
> > come home, and while there is a place for that, we should be aware 
> > that it will not yield a list of what to do.
> 
> I thought the last sentence covered what to do:
> "And so the best that can be hoped for is that American
> voters will do for conservatives what they are unable to
> do themselves: to vote them out of office". 


But even so, will the "real conservative" please stand up? 

These labels are worse then useless. Maybe they meant something in
simpler times, but they have been so spun and bastardized that there is
no semblance of useful meaning left. You could accuse me of having
"conservative" and "liberal" tendencies, but what possible value does
that yield?

Look at the Democrats and how their bought-and-paid-for rulership
deviates from it's rank and file for a perfect example of how people are
lining up behind "false labels"

Yes, we surely need to vote the crooked SOB's out of Washington, but if
we don't fix the underlying information system and election process,
we'll only wind up with different talking heads saying the same things.

For openers, people who are elected into office must take an oath not to
enrich themselves or their friends with the power we're granting them.
People who represent us need to live with us, not in cloistered
Washington surrounded by lobbyists. Monopolies and special interests be
damned in the land of the free. We have the technology to implement real
democracy, do it! The will of the people cannot be worse then the
position we're in today.


Bill








 
> Jim Eddins
> 
> 
> 
> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to