-----Opprinnelig melding----- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Dominic Burford Sendt: 28. juni 2006 14:04 Til: ProFox Email List Emne: RE: Strong parameter checking
< I'm curious to find out how. I would have thought a strongly typed language would have been *more* difficult to refactor, for the same rasons that it can take longer to develop using them i.e. they can prevent certain object interactions due to their enforcement of data types, and thus leads to additional code being written which conforms to these constraints. > True, but on the other hand, if you change, say, a method signature, a compiler can spot every place in which a change is needed. Furthermore, if you change the name of a function or class member or the order in which parameters are sent to a function, a tool such as VS can do the refactoring for you automatically. Still, I guess the answer to the question of development speed and strong/static vs weak typing is: "it depends" =) Eyvind. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
